This knowledge has been available for peer review since 2015.

Full statement

Despite multiple submissions - and a mailing to 500 physicists - no rebuttal of the analysis has been offered. However, no remedial action has been taken. It seems evidence contrary to present belief is undesirable.

The concern is this:

In his Theory of General Relativity, Albert Einstein predicted time travels at different rates in the universe, and it is broadly accepted evidence now exists to support the claim.

And when measuring the distance of a light year, the parameter of time is used twice; once in the year of an earth orbit, and again in the second used to calculate the speed of light in metres per second.

It is a simple task to show these times must be inversely proportional. That is, as time becomes slower for the light, the year becomes an underestimate of the distance the light has travelled, and faster time for the light becomes an overestimate of distance. In an infinite universe, the scale of error is potentially infinite.

If this assertion cannot be disproved, a door opens to new ideas that may answer questions and change some of our beliefs about the universe; but it seems science authorities cannot acknowledge the possibility of error because they've been building on the certainty of a flawed theory for far too long to examine and expose such a simple mistake.

Most recently I tried to petition Lord Bragg in the House of Lords: on 1/6/21, 26/10/21, and 14/6/23, without success.

In order to best serve public interest, there now seems no other choice but to seek representation to affect positive change.

Please cast your vote for the candidate who you feel is best equipped to create the future you think is right.

I stand for the pursuit of truth and disproof in science, and if you think it is me I ask for your support AND vote.